Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
-
wdovew
- Newbie
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3829a/3829a5f788563b1091db993c44e0562916a60546" alt="Newbie Newbie"
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2021 4:35 am
#1
Post
by wdovew » Tue Oct 31, 2023 2:43 pm
Dear, VASP Expert,
Thank you very much for your reading and answers. The problems are follows:
By utilizing the better output files(ML_FF and ML_AB by ML_MODE =test) and later calculating the energy in different magnetic configurations( ML_MODE =run). I'm confused about such use, I wonder if vasp can use the machine learning potential directly for total energy calculations for different magnetic structures after obtaining ML_FF. Is the energy difference between the different magnetic structures within the error allowance of the direct self-consistent calculations? Have you tested this for some magnetic materials?
Looking forward to your reply.
Best wishes.
User, wdovew
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efdbf/efdbfd6c7501a431a7a2ad4d9102edd34c93ca4e" alt="Smiley :)"
-
ferenc_karsai
- Global Moderator
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9724d/9724d5493f73898f09f07bb705923af19d364fe4" alt="Global Moderator Global Moderator"
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2019 12:44 pm
#2
Post
by ferenc_karsai » Mon Nov 06, 2023 8:37 am
At the moment there is no quantity such as the magnetic moment implemented in the MLFFs which could distinguish different magnetizations. So if magnetization plays a strong role for structure distinction the force-fields cannot predict the right structure solely on the lattice and atom positions itself.
If magnetization plays a minor role for structure distinction one can get away with the currently implemented force field.